Matthew 5:27 ¶ Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: 28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. 29 And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. 30 And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. 31 It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement: 32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
I have already explained in the last passage about how verse 32 is
written so that we are required in our mind to include saving for the cause
of fornication after the last divorced. Here, in this passage Jesus
goes deeper into the meaning of the Law and God’s intent. Let’s look at
passages about divorce under the Law.
Deuteronomy 24:1 ¶ When a
man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no
favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him
write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of
his house. 2 And when she is departed
out of his house, she may go and be another man’s wife. 3 And if the latter husband hate her, and write
her a bill of divorcement, and giveth it in her hand, and sendeth her out of
his house; or if the latter husband die, which took her to be his wife; 4 Her former husband, which sent her away, may
not take her again to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that is
abomination before the LORD: and thou shalt not cause the land to sin, which
the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.
Although uncleanness can mean other things this uncleanness
referred to in verse 1 of Deuteronomy 24 can be linked to this definition due
to the context.
Numbers 5:19 And the priest
shall charge her by an oath, and say unto the woman, If no man have lain with
thee, and if thou hast not gone aside to uncleanness with another instead of
thy husband, be thou free from this bitter water that causeth the curse:
So, we are talking about adultery here in replacing your wife.
Now, in the Roman world of that time divorce was easy to accomplish just by
declaring you were no longer married and moving on to the next one. The emperor
Augustus felt that husbands were not punishing adultery so it became a crime
and finding your wife in bed with another man allowed for justifiable homicide.
Roman husbands had absolute control over their wives and children and could
even kill their children such as handicapped infants. Jesus notes that under
the Law there was only one justification, adultery, for divorce.
The Jew and by extension, the Christian, has already committed the
sin of adultery by looking at a woman with the intention of committing adultery
with her. The context and the way the sentences are written show that this is
about the intention to commit adultery, not about noticing a woman in hot pants
and a tank top walking in front of you before you avert your eyes. This is not
a condemnation of being a red-blooded male who will have to make himself look
away but of the intention to commit a grievous sin against God that is likened
in the Old Testament to Jews who practiced idolatry in opposition to God.
Notice here how Jesus says it is better for the Jew justified by
works, by literal obedience to the literal Law to lose a part of his body
rather than be cast into Hell. This sentiment underscores an important
difference between the Jews and the Christian unless you believe that you can
lose your salvation. Where the eyes looked and where the hand touched could
place the Jew in grave danger of damnation. Think about that.
Some sources say that by the First Century AD the Jews had made
divorce much easier for a man. Jesus was objecting to this type of “no-fault
from the man’s perspective” divorce. Jesus’ ruling like God’s Supreme Court
here is really in the favor of women who could then not be cast off like an old
newspaper. The Pharisees had dumbed down God’s commands to suit themselves.
They will confront Jesus later about this. Notice for every cause.
Matthew 19:1 ¶ And it came
to pass, that when Jesus had finished these sayings, he departed from Galilee,
and came into the coasts of Judaea beyond Jordan; 2 And great multitudes followed him; and he
healed them there.
3 ¶ The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting
him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every
cause? 4 And he answered and said unto
them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male
and female, 5 And said, For this cause
shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they
twain shall be one flesh? 6 Wherefore
they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together,
let not man put asunder. 7 They say unto
him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put
her away? 8 He saith unto them, Moses
because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but
from the beginning it was not so. 9 And
I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for
fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth
her which is put away doth commit adultery. 10
His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife,
it is not good to marry.

No comments:
Post a Comment