This does not
prove, of course, that either doctrine is true but just that they are not new
doctrines, either the premillennial view or the translation of the church, but
that these early church leaders, the viewpoint of the Apostles who knew Christ,
and the Scriptures can point in this direction.
The dominant
viewpoint of the Roman Catholic Church after Augustine was that there was no
millennium, in that references to a thousand year reign were allegorical and
that the Roman church was ruling the world in Christ’s place as his proxy. The
Reformation called that into doubt. The dominant viewpoint in early America up
to the turn of the 20th century among evangelical Protestants was
called postmillennial, in that the church would rule the world with Christ
reigning spiritually through it, as men became more righteous and more
Christian in appearance and practice.
The American
Theological Review, in 1859, said that postmillennialism, whereby a millennium
would be set up and the religion of Christ would be everywhere and, “his
spiritual reign would be universal,” and that would be followed by Christ’s
physical return was the, “commonly received doctrine,” in the 1800’s. While
admitting that this was not what the early church believed, as the early church
said and we believe, He will return first to rule and then the millennium, the
thousand year reign, will come, the author goes on to say that the early church
was simply wrong.[1]
PART 7 Christians today
who do not believe in the Translation of the church, popularly called The Rapture, will say that preacher of
the early 1800’s, John Nelson Darby, invented the doctrine. He did popularize
it in a world that regarded evolutionary progress as truth and that mankind and
Christians in particular were headed toward a Golden Age of righteousness and peace.[2]
[1]
Henry Boynton Smith, ”History of Opinions Respecting the Millennium,” The American Theological Review (Boston:
Charles Scribner & Son, 1859), 642.
[2]
J.N. Darby, “The Rapture of the Saints,” in The
Heavenly Hope, or, What is the Hope of the Christian? What is the Hope of the
Church? (Dublin: Dublin Tract Repository, 1844).

No comments:
Post a Comment