1
¶ And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
2 Speak unto the children of Israel,
that they turn and encamp before Pihahiroth, between Migdol and the sea, over
against Baalzephon: before it shall ye encamp by the sea. 3 For Pharaoh will say of the children of
Israel, They are entangled in the land, the wilderness hath shut them in.
4 And I will harden Pharaoh’s heart,
that he shall follow after them; and I will be honoured upon Pharaoh, and upon
all his host; that the Egyptians may know that I am the LORD. And they did so.
5 And it was told the king of Egypt that
the people fled: and the heart of Pharaoh and of his servants was turned
against the people, and they said, Why have we done this, that we have let
Israel go from serving us? 6 And he made
ready his chariot, and took his people with him: 7 And he took six hundred chosen chariots, and
all the chariots of Egypt, and captains over every one of them. 8 And the LORD hardened the heart of Pharaoh
king of Egypt, and he pursued after the children of Israel: and the children of
Israel went out with an high hand. 9 But
the Egyptians pursued after them, all the horses and chariots of Pharaoh, and
his horsemen, and his army, and overtook them encamping by the sea, beside
Pihahiroth, before Baalzephon.
From Etham the Hebrews are directed to go
set up camp at Pihahiroth, between Migdol
and the sea, over against Baalzephon: before it shall ye encamp by the sea. Now,
from their starting point at Rameses they have traveled to Succoth and Etham
and are now told to encamp here. These are traditionally locations to the west
of the Gulf of Suez, an arm of the Red Sea.
The Hebrews are now
between Migdol and the Red Sea.
Again, God hardens Pharaoh’s disobedient heart and encourages him to chase
after the Hebrews in regret over letting his slaves go. He takes 600 chariots,
and it says all the chariots of Egypt.
Chariots
will play a very important part in places in the Old Testament and be a source
of contention. One thing missing in scholarship and Bible exposition is the
common sense understanding of chariot warfare. A chariot was a mobile fighting
platform as well as a ceremonial vehicle whose weak link was also how it was
delivered to the forefront of the battle so quickly; its horses. Logic tells
us, logic and common sense, that the horses would be what the infantry would go
after first. Kill the horses and the chariot cannot move and respond to the
battle. So, with chariots there needed to be a string of horses and horsemen to
accompany them. Like the pit crew at a NASCAR event these teams needed to be
able to replace dead and injured horses or, in a fierce battle, the chariot
would have been rendered useless and even helpless quite quickly, as the driver
would not be able to remove to safety in the event of being overwhelmed, with
dead horses.
1Kings
4:26 And Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses for his
chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen.
2Chronicles
9:25 And Solomon had four thousand stalls for horses and
chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen; whom he bestowed in the chariot
cities, and with the king at Jerusalem.
So, in these two verses which have been the source of
much disagreement it is very obvious to me that Solomon had 40,000 stalls for
chariot horses and 4,000 stalls that were big enough for the chariot and the
horse team that drew it. This would be necessary for maintenance and
preparation before training and battle. This also implies a string of 10 horses
per chariot as the primary team and backup. These backup teams would have not
only needed protection by cavalry but perhaps were a capable fighting force all
their own. There is no contradiction, just common sense and reading
comprehension needed here.
What is about to happen will explain this
verse in Numbers.
Numbers
14:9 Only rebel not ye against the LORD,
neither fear ye the people of the land; for they are bread for us: their defence is departed from them,
and the LORD is with us: fear them not.
The Amarna Letters tell us of Canaanite
kings pleading for military help against the Hebrews, military help that was
not forthcoming because the Egyptian army was destroyed.
Historical records are very incomplete and
traditional dating in Egyptology is conflicting and unreliable. It is difficult
to put the events we know from the Bible in perfect order with what we think we
know from the scant historical records. A pharaoh named Thutmose III was called
the Napoleon of Egypt and he conquered the area of Canaan. His eldest son died.
Skip a couple of generations and another pharaoh’s eldest son died and a
pharaoh came to the throne and tried to institute the worship of one god but
failed. Somewhere in all of this swirl of uncertain history, guesswork, and
conclusions drawn from scant information is the pharaoh of the Exodus and his
successors.
No comments:
Post a Comment