Translate

Saturday, August 13, 2016

Genesis 9:18-29 comments: Noah's curse


18 ¶  And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan. 19  These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread. 20  And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: 21  And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22  And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. 23  And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness.

    24 ¶  And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. 25  And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. 26  And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. 27  God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.

    28 ¶  And Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years. 29  And all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years: and he died.

The entire earth was eventually settled by the offspring of these three sons. This is not hard to accept, even from the point of view of modern theoretical science. Scientists theorize that there may have been many, “severe population bottlenecks,” of human beings in the distant past based on their assumptions about evolution. (36) Of course, their conclusions are filled with speculations and interpretations based on an atheistic worldview in that they might think, “we don’t know for sure but it must be so because the alternative of the Bible being true is just too horrible for us to imagine.” The point is that here is the ultimate population bottleneck and there may have been others later until humanity got on its feet, so to speak.

It is possible that, based on the change in conditions, Noah would not have known that fermentation could take place and that he could get drunk. Or, perhaps the long voyage and time of struggle surviving and leading his little tribe after disembarking from the ark made him desperate to get roaring drunk as soon as it was possible to do so. Either way, that is what happened.

To see the nakedness of someone carries with it a very wicked implication.

Leviticus 20:17  And if a man shall take his sister, his father’s daughter, or his mother’s daughter, and see her nakedness, and she see his nakedness; it is a wicked thing; and they shall be cut off in the sight of their people: he hath uncovered his sister’s nakedness; he shall bear his iniquity.

But, let’s say, for argument sake, that this is not an idiom suggesting actual sexual contact with either Noah or Ham’s mother which it appears to be.

Leviticus 20:11  And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

To keep from delving into aspects of this event that incite prurient interest in a reader or listener let’s say for argument sake that this event involved only vulgar disrespect and mocking. God had already blessed Noah and his sons in verse 1 of chapter 9. So, Noah cursed Ham’s son, Canaan, and this curse was fulfilled in Israel’s conquest of Canaan hundreds of years later. Noah blessed Shem and Japheth further, due to their respect and merciful deed toward him and their mother, one assumes, and prophesied that Canaan would be their servant, which proved very true as Palestine, where Canaan dwelt, became the victim of many conquests from Israel to the Persians to the Turks to the Crusaders and the Turks again to the British and French with many in between. Palestine was an avenue of conquest between the warlike culture of Babylonia and Assyria to Egypt.

There was a myth fostered and promoted as a justification for racial slavery in the United States, although it had a small number of voices before, that Ham was the father of the black, African races, thereby making the curse on Canaan really a curse on Ham and all of his descendants. This myth gained ascendancy in Antebellum America and is still popular among racist preachers and congregations. The most exhaustive study of this myth I have read is by Stephen Haynes, a professor of Religious Studies at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee. (37)

While a literal view of this passage reveals that the curse was laid upon Canaan, a curse we will see was literally enforced as per proof in the Bible narrative, we will also soon see that Ham was not just the ancestor of African populations. In fact, let’s make something clear. The idea that Noah walked off the ark with three sons; one of whom was a white guy, one a black guy, and one an Asian guy is so patently absurd that it can only be dismissed as the raving of a lunatic who has an agenda. Mankind would have been brownish with dark hair and eyes at this time, with some variation possible which foundations were already in the genetic code God had placed in man and God operated with each cell division and each generation. Race, a social construct, that has little bearing in physical reality, based more on politics, geography, and culture, will come about later, over time. Some geneticists estimate that the classic white skinned, blue eyed Caucasian came about between 5 and 6,000 years ago as, in their elongated time frame based on their dating methods, early Europeans were dark-skinned, brown-eyed, and dark-haired. There are a number of genetic studies confirming this belief of the modern geneticist. Unfortunately, we are still using classifications from the racist 19th century that alternately render black people between being, as a group, naturally villains or fools, and impulsive victims of their own biology. Such nonsense should not be honored in a Christian church.

Galatians 3:28  There is neither Jew nor Greek [grades of ethnicity or race], there is neither bond nor free [grades of social class], there is neither male nor female [grades of gender] : for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

Colossians 3:11  Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.

Noah lived for several centuries after the Flood to see several noteworthy events, perhaps to his further shame.

·         (36) John Hawks, Keith Hunley, Sang-Hee Lee, Milford Wolpoff, “Population Bottlenecks and Pleistocene Human Evolution,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, Volume 17, Issue 1, Pp. 2-22.




(37) Stephen R. Haynes, Noah’s Curse: The Biblical Justification of American Slavery (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).

Friday, August 12, 2016

Genesis 9:8-17 comments: a covenant


8 ¶  And God spake unto Noah, and to his sons with him, saying, 9  And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed after you; 10  And with every living creature that is with you, of the fowl, of the cattle, and of every beast of the earth with you; from all that go out of the ark, to every beast of the earth. 11  And I will establish my covenant with you; neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth.

    12 ¶  And God said, This is the token of the covenant which I make between me and you and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations: 13  I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth. 14  And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: 15  And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. 16  And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. 17  And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.

God made a covenant with Noah, his sons, and all of the creatures with Noah, that He would never destroy the earth with a great flood again. All of those waters under the surface of the earth that I referenced earlier will stay under the earth and although devastating floods are possible none like this one that reduced life on earth to a precious few will be permitted again.

The rainbow we see in the sky is an ever-present reminder of God’s covenant that the world will never be destroyed by a great flood. A rainbow is an optical phenomenon that happens when the sun shines through water droplets in the atmosphere. Its existence is verification that the atmosphere of the pre-Flood earth was very different from that of the post-Flood earth. The fact that it is possible after and not before the Flood is evidence of the vast difference between the conditions. Just as Mount Saint Helens’ eruption showed us that geological events that were thought took hundreds of millions of years to occur took place in the span of hours and that formations like the Grand Canyon and The Scablands also could have been formed quickly are evidences of the Great Flood of Noah, so the rainbow, God’s sign of a covenant not to cause the Flood again, is evidence of the great change between old and new earth.

We see evidence of the Great Flood all around us. We run our civilization on petroleum products that resulted from a tremendous biomass being crushed under great pressure. Fossil fuels are just that. We find fossils of creatures that have modern representatives and creatures that are extinct as fossils. A fossil doesn’t occur when something just falls out on the ground, is eaten, rots, decays, and disappears. A fossil occurs when a creature dies in a sudden cataclysm and is preserved in rock by great pressure. Scientists will use terminology like a fossil is formed when a plant or animal dies in a watery environment and is covered with mud or silt or they will just say they were buried quickly. But, this is explained very readily by the Flood of Noah given to us in the Bible, a primary source with God relaying what happened to Moses, who wrote it down.

Evidence of the flood includes fossils of trees that extend through many geological strata or levels so that they are called polystrate fossils as in Yellowstone Park with fossil trees formed by rapid sedimentation and violent volcanic action. What modern scientists say are geological strata laid down over long ages were laid down rather quickly during the Flood, an example of which we saw in Mount Saint Helens’ eruption. Another evidence is that fossils often are found in strata that is reversed or lacking in continuity. In other words, the supposedly older strata are over the younger.

But, if you trusted the Bible you wouldn’t need this proof. Still, it is out there as the most reasonable explanation of the conditions of the earth in which we live, if you believe God. The evidence, the facts, don’t change but the interpretation of the evidence does as the conclusions of modern theoretical science are based on ideology and the way they view the world, not incontrovertible truth.

Think of the logic of it for a moment. Modern scientific theories fall under the uncertainty that, “To be accepted as a paradigm, a theory must seem better than its competitors, but it need not, and in fact never does, explain all the facts with which it can be confronted.”(33)  For example, “Copernicus’ more elaborate proposal [a sun centered solar system] was neither simpler nor more accurate than Ptolemy’s [a fixed earth as the center].” (34) The truth is simply that, “We now know that the difference between a heliocentric theory and a geocentric theory is one of relative motion only, and that such a difference has no physical significance.” (35)

And yet, Christians have, for the most part, bought into modern scientific theory and denied the Bible’s literal statements where it is convenient to do so. When a scientist makes a declaration that appears to attack some point of the Bible, like the great catastrophe of the Flood, consider what they are saying, why, and how. The theoretical scientist of today is not a prophet getting a revelation from God. He is a modern priest only receiving a revelation from his own reasoning ability which God points out in His word is damaged and unresponsive to the truth of God.

(33) (34) Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962), 18, 76.



(35) Fred Hoyle, Astronomy and Cosmology: A Modern Course (San Francisco: W.H. Freeman & Co., 1975), 87.

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Genesis 9:1-7 comments: things have changed


1 ¶  And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth. 2  And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered. 3  Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. 4  But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat. 5  And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man’s brother will I require the life of man. 6  Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man. 7  And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein.

The command that was given to Adam and Eve at the beginning is repeated here.

Genesis 1:28a  And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth…

The task is now placed on Noah and his sons to populate the earth. This is truly a population bottleneck if there ever was one. Modern scientists postulate several of these at various times.

The assumption is made here that pre-Flood humankind was a vegetarian because in the beginning of Genesis he is given plants and fruits to eat. Now, mankind is permitted to kill and eat animals. Also, previous to this, animals were not afraid of humans as many of the more intelligent ones are now. Man is warned not to drink blood. This admonition is here before the Law given to Moses, within that Law for the Hebrews (Leviticus 3:17), and after that Law for the Gentile church (Acts 15:20).

Capital punishment is allowed and required for murder and the killing of man by both beast and man. This command is further defined and refined in every culture of mankind’s on the planet but murder is nowhere generally allowed although for reasons of corruption, status and rank, and oppression it has been permitted at certain times by certain people and groups of people. But, murder is forbidden here and is punishable by death.

Clearly, then, biological and legal conditions were quite different on this cleansed earth than on the pre-Flood earth. Flesh is allowed to be eaten but not blood. Animals generally fear mankind. The murderer and the beast that kills a man must forfeit their own lives rather than be exiled like Cain or get away with bragging about it like Lamech. As we know from reading God’s speech to Job in that book God’s hand is found in every aspect of reality as it continues from moment to moment, including animals obtaining their prey as being from God’s hand directly. So, this is not something that just happens and God is standing back watching, but He is intimately involved in these new conditions of the continuing judgment against mankind’s rebellious nature. Prey and predator, man’s concept of justice, and dietary changes that required a change in our physiology like your lust and need for flesh, perhaps, were all part of God’s unfolding plan that pointed toward Christ, God Himself coming to bear man’s punishment and to pardon him from his ‘just deserts.’

Again the command is made to populate the earth, as it brackets this passage.

Tuesday, August 9, 2016

Genesis 8:13-22 comments: evil from his youth


    13 ¶  And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth: and Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and, behold, the face of the ground was dry. 14  And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried.

    15 ¶  And God spake unto Noah, saying, 16  Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons’ wives with thee. 17  Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth. 18  And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons’ wives with him: 19  Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark.

    20 ¶  And Noah builded an altar unto the LORD; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar. 21  And the LORD smelled a sweet savour; and the LORD said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man’s sake; for the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done. 22  While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.

Verse 13 contains a cross-reference to chapter 7, verse 11, where these events are linked to Noah’s age. As mentioned previously the earth is still drying out in one way or another.

God gives a command to Noah to leave the ark so there is no possibility of this small group of people trying to stay with the boat. They could use the material the ark was built from to make shelter, carrying what they could with them, and returning to get what they could not carry but they did have quite a few animals that could be used to carry burdens of material and whatever supplies were left.

Noah honors God with sacrifices of burnt offerings. Sacrificed animals represent God’s own sacrifice when He comes in the flesh as the Lord Jesus Christ. Animals, unlike human beings, do Gods will as part of their nature and act as agents of God’s plans throughout the Bible.

God responds to Noah’s sacrifices and makes a covenant with Himself, not dependent upon man’s participation or agreement, that considering that mankind is inherently evil He will, in any event, agree not to do two things First, he will no more curse the ground. The Bible says I will not again curse the ground any more for man’s sake and God says neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done. So, there are two things He says He will not do. He will no longer curse the ground and He will no longer destroy all life, or almost all life, as He had just done.

This brings to mind the curse of Genesis 3:17. Does this mean that the curse God laid on Adam for the difficult work that he would have in making the earth give up its bounty was now removed? It is more likely now that the curse on the ground is no blanket curse on the whole earth as farming is difficult to varying degrees with some places giving up their bounty rather easily and others being hard to make productive. Only about 10% of the world’s land area is suitable for agriculture.

God also promised not to destroy all life on earth. In stating this He made it necessary that the judgment at the end of the world must be curtailed so that He could keep this covenant with Himself.

Matthew 24:22  And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened.

God agreed to this in spite of the fact that the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth.

There is an ideal that comes directly from the philosophers of the so-called Enlightenment which influence in some part resulted in racial slavery, one justification for imperial conquest, and the massive genocides of the 20th century that says that man is basically good and can be perfected. This concept ran all through the American religious impulse of the nineteenth century (1800’s), the age of great revivals and social movements. The belief in a man-created millennium of peace, prosperity, knowledge, and the fulfillment of man’s promise as a noble creature was one driving force of both religious and secular thought. Paternalism resulted in believing that one culture and race or ideology and religion must lead all of the others and the others had no choice but to follow them into this glorious era of man’s perfection.  This idea infected America’s Founding Fathers as it infects political policy today in dealing with welfare, law and order, education, and medicine among other areas of civic life, even parenting. However, the Bible makes it clear that this belief is simply wrong and much woe would have been avoided had the Bible been believed by our leaders and the people who follow them in blind obedience. The Bible says;

Jeremiah 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps.

Jeremiah 17:9  The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?

And Jesus, speaking to His own disciples, said;

Matthew 7:11  If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give good things to them that ask him?

God’s people are admonished;

Proverbs 3:5  Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. 6  In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.

Along with understanding God’s sovereignty over all creation, even over all reality as underscored in the Book of Job, the understanding of mankind’s inherent shortcoming as a moral

agent will keep one from much confusion and heartache.



As long as the earth exists there will be seasons and day and night, as the rhythm of existence continues unabated. We do, however, await a new heavens and a new earth.

Isaiah 65:17  For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.

Isaiah 66:22  For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the LORD, so shall your seed and your name remain.

2Peter 3:13  Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.

Revelation 21:1  And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.

Sunday, August 7, 2016

Genesis 8:6-12 comments: the raven and the dove


6 ¶  And it came to pass at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made: 7  And he sent forth a raven, which went forth to and fro, until the waters were dried up from off the earth. 8  Also he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground; 9  But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth: then he put forth his hand, and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark. 10  And he stayed yet other seven days; and again he sent forth the dove out of the ark; 11  And the dove came in to him in the evening; and, lo, in her mouth was an olive leaf pluckt off: so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth. 12  And he stayed yet other seven days; and sent forth the dove; which returned not again unto him any more.

Forty days is a period of testing and fasting in the Bible among other things but more importantly of waiting on God, as Noah must do here. See Moses, Elijah, and Jesus’ experiences.

Exodus 34:28  And he was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread, nor drink water. And he wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the ten commandments.

1Kings 19:8  And he arose, and did eat and drink, and went in the strength of that meat forty days and forty nights unto Horeb the mount of God.

Matthew 4:2  And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he was afterward an hungred.

There is a symbolic significance to sending out a raven and a dove although the literal meaning is that Noah did just that. As mankind is about to embark on a new beginning on an earth that is being reborn the raven, a bird that is forbidden to be eaten under the Law given to Moses later, is sent out of the ark. Ravens are scavengers and predators so, presumably, this one would have found something to eat.

Ravens are given the task to feed Elijah in a time of drought in 1Kings 17:1-7. God is said to provide their food in Job 38:41 and Psalm 147:9 and Luke 12:24.

And yet, they, along with owls, bitterns, and cormorants are among the unclean birds that represent the desolation of Idumea in Isaiah 34.

The dove with the olive leaf in her mouth is a powerful motif in western civilization representing making peace and Christ uses the dove in contrast to the serpent in Matthew 10:16 with the serpent representing wisdom and the dove representing the harmless nature of the Jewish witnesses for Him to Israel so that no one could mistake Christ’s message to be rightly delivered by the sword. The Catholic Church and Spain and the Anglican Church and England did much abuse to the Scriptures by their evangelization of the world by conquest, murder, and slavery. In this, the dove represents the witness for Christ, the essence of which is peace with God, to a world that has been convulsed and destroyed by sin and an alienation from our Creator.

 The Holy Spirit descends like a dove on Christ. The use of the words like or as in describing a relationship is called a simile so it does not follow in the verse I am going to quote that the Holy Spirit looks like a dove but that that it descended like a dove landing. Many Christian artists have represented the Holy Spirit, though, by the dove with the olive leaf, or usually branch, in its mouth.

Mark 1:10  And straightway coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens opened, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon him:

Christ is our peace with God, making of Jew and Gentile one new man, reconciling us both to God.

Ephesians 2:14 ¶  For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us; 15  Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace; 16  And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby: 17  And came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh. 18  For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father. 19  Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God; 20  And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; 21  In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord: 22  In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.

Also, both good and evil, sacred and profane, proceeds from the ark onto the earth, represented by the dove and the raven. Mankind will visit his sinful nature and his desire to walk with God upon this earth throughout history, both sides of his character.

There are an enormous number of sermons that have been made and can be made regarding the significance of the raven and the dove but I’ll move on to keep from getting bogged down.

Friday, August 5, 2016

Genesis 8:4, 5 comments: the mountains of Ararat (revised)


4 ¶  And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat. 5  And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month: in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen.

The mountains of Ararat is an enormous mountain system or massif rising 17,000 feet from a base of plains that are already 2-3,000 feet high. It is crowned by Mount Ararat consisting of two volcanic cones, long dormant, called Greater Ararat and Little Ararat. The ice cap that covers Mount Ararat is 17 square miles and 350 feet deep while the massif itself, the mountains of Ararat, is 25 miles in diameter. It would have been, if I am understanding the information correctly, in ancient Armenia.

Jeremiah 51:27  Set ye up a standard in the land, blow the trumpet among the nations, prepare the nations against her, call together against her the kingdoms of Ararat, Minni, and Ashchenaz; appoint a captain against her; cause the horses to come up as the rough caterpillers.

Mount Ararat is located in extreme Eastern Turkey. Some have claimed to have seen the remains of the ark on that mountain but travel has been difficult there partly due to the geopolitical situation in that area with Armenia, formerly of the USSR, and Iran so near. Still, a number of expeditions have failed to produce conclusive remains of Noah’s Ark, although supposed eyewitness accounts are very interesting.(32)

Still, whether or not Noah’s Ark has been seen should not impress a Bible-believer who has faith in the written word of God and needs no relic to confirm or bolster that faith in an argument. Relics like the Shroud of Turin and the possible remains of Noah’s Ark tickle the fancy of people who do not believe the Bible explicitly and are always searching for the place where the Hebrews landed after crossing the Red Sea or claiming to have found, during the Crusades, a piece of the spear that pierced Christ’s side and on and on. Stick with the Bible as all of the archaeologists’ spades and shovels in the world will never dig up most of history which is lost in the dust as long as this earth lasts. Do not hinge your faith on the finding of an object that you think verifies your belief. If you need relics to confirm your faith you have a weak faith indeed.

John 20:29  Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.

Still, it is a fascinating thought to imagine where mankind issued from after the Flood.

(32) Mount Ararat – Noah’s Ark Search, http://www.noahsarksearch.com/ararat.htm. (accessed 8.4.2016).

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Genesis 8:1-3 comments: waters abate


1 ¶  And God remembered Noah, and every living thing, and all the cattle that was with him in the ark: and God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters asswaged; 2  The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained; 3  And the waters returned from off the earth continually: and after the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters were abated.

And God remembered Noah does not say, in this context, that God forgot about him but that God revisited him, brought him back into play, turned His attention to him. In pre-1611 dictionaries something remembered was something worthy to be mentioned, thought about, or spoken of, not as it is often today, something I had forgotten but has now come to mind.

Genesis 19:29  And it came to pass, when God destroyed the cities of the plain, that God remembered Abraham, and sent Lot out of the midst of the overthrow, when he overthrew the cities in the which Lot dwelt.

Genesis 30:22  And God remembered Rachel, and God hearkened to her, and opened her womb.

After, or even during, the hundred and fifty days God causes a wind to pass over the earth and the waters asswaged meaning, as this context states, abated. The wind caused the waters to diminish much as wind now causes wet ground to dry out. This would have been a powerful wind as the speed of the wind flowing across the water also affects how fast it will dry. This drying out process did not stop with the emergence of dry land again.

Some modern scientists theorize a time when the earth was nearly covered in water although, as with most of modern theory they put this time in a remote, unapproachable, and I might add, unproveable distant past. They talk about an explosion of life and the appearance of dry land but they put it in a different order and at a different time than God’s testimony in the Bible reveals.(29) Of course, as with all pursuits dependent upon a philosophy, in their case atheistic materialism, the evidence is interpreted in accordance with one’s worldview unless the light of the Holy Spirit shines through one’s clogged thinking. God says one thing, they say another. Believe God.

The earth has been undergoing a drying out period for the last several thousands of years as indicated by the formation of such places as the Sahara Desert which is thought by some to have gone, about 5,000 years ago, from a very wet place to a very dry place, and it is growing yearly.(30)

Nevertheless, volumes of fossils that had once been ocean life have been found in the heights of mountain ranges around the world, showing that those peaks were once under water and while that evidence is interpreted differently by an atheist it clearly shows the veracity of the Bible to anyone with an open mind.(31)

(29) University Of California - Davis. "When The Earth Dried Out." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/02/020208075438.htm  (accessed August 2, 2016).

(30) Becky Oskin, “Sahara went from Green to Desert in a Flash,” LiveScience. April 5, 2013.




(31) Carol Marie Tang, “Tethys Sea,” Encyclopaedia Brittanica. https://www.britannica.com/place/Tethys-Sea. (accessed August 2, 2016).